Loose, with Scotty sharing hooker with Fisher.

He could play both I believe - though perhaps not simultaneously. That way it could be a kick in the teeth to both Scott Murrell and Scott Taylor.

That would be a terrible kick in the teeth for young Hodgson though wouldn't it? And with Spaven still picking his premolars off the floor it could be protein shakes all round in 2010.

Not really, do you HONESTLY believe Hodgson will be first or second choice hooker in 2010. He is one for the future.

It was a TIC jibe at a standard trolling technique that often greets our new signings. Having more than one player for any given position creates tension rather competition, apparently.

Tbf there is a thread on their board worrying about fitting all their forwards into one team, so perhaps they are not all trolls and some are genuinely stupid.

Back on topic i think Mounis would be an incredibly good signing and if true would provide further proof that Murrell is seen as a hooker, a position he excelled in at Acadamy level and a position i think he'd excel in at SL level as well.

Hodgson is to be 2nd choice hooker for next year

So rotating off the bench then

Nobody will with his calls next season.
[iI shall say zis only once![/i

Wait till all signings for 2010 are announced before you post above.

Right back at ya

I'd hope so that is the reason why he left Hull, to play first team football.

Murrell looks good at 13, what would teh point in moving him.

Thought he left Hull because because he was played out of position too much, I would expect him to play mainly reserves next season and come through in 2011, maybe some game time next season from the bench.