You remind me of that little bloke off fantasy island. Do you go around pointing at the sky shouting "De plane, de plane"?

]
Ah. You're making up words and indiscriminatingly attributing them to people who've said no such thing once again. Careful. Your periphrastic projectiles reminded me of the the increasingly hysterical ramblings of one who is inebriated, hence my question.

What makes you assume that the smaller capacities declared for those KC matches were because of the deduction of the premier pass numbers?

Just had an email from John:

"Dear Jake,

Just read that made up email that the deluded zod has posted on RL Fans. I can confirm that premier club passes aren't counted in the official attendance figures unless the people are actually in the ground. It's why we have a computerised system and it's needed to comply with H&S legislation and the stadium operating licence.

Any fool could see there were more than 3000 in the stadium last night but then again, zod isn't just any fool, is he?

All the best

John"

See, I've just proven that there were more than the made up 3070 there last night

It's sounds like you're the one who's had a drink.

A few gobby FC fans have discredited the fact premier passes are included in the attendances declared to the media to try and deflect the fact there were only 3070 paying supporters at the KC last night.

I highlighted that the unreserved seating capacity of the KC is 23k - a figure which was twice declared in both the derbies at the KC in 2007 (unless premier pass holders sit on the roof or somewhere).

Consequently this proves that premier passes are in fact included in the overall attendance figure declared to the media so you only got 3070 last night.

All those gobbing off initially disputing that premier passes are included in the released figure have chosen not to discuss my point of the 23k figure being declared twice in 2007.

Your suppositions and assumed extrapolations are fictions of your own imagination. Were you at the KC last night? I was. I saw a crowd of around 5000. The pouring rain meant most people were sitting towards the top and back of the east and south stands. The telly cameras tend to show the bottom half of the stands when filming across the pitch, so the ground looked a lot emptier on telly than it was. Perhaps all 2000 or so premier passholders went last night? Or perhaps I'd had so many shandies I was seeing double and the 3000 you've conjured in your mind is real .

Delusional. Nothing more.

Still, perhaps the Charlie the Prodigal Son's return in 2014 can alleviate his misery of an abject season where Sandercock was close to being sacked but mysteriously given a 12 month stay of execution for some reason.

I can feel the "Still the only Hull team to win at Wembley" desperation/straw clutching finale coming soon.....

Is that before or after they've all washed their socks.

He once earlier this season put a rovers defeat at Cas down to the length of the pitch.

Not at all. I said [iprior[/i to the game we'll have to ensure our edge defence is good because an 88m pitch means there's inevitably going to mean there's more goal line defence than in games on 100m pitch.

If you say it enough eventually someone else might actually start to believe you

That's how this message board works.

Anyway, no-one choses to explain those 2007 attendances which says it all.

No one believes you or even cares