Not Salford bound, and not going back to Aus because of his wife. He's heading home because he's been asked to take a pay cut!

My impreccable source knows everything about Rovers (despite being a B&W) so it is 100% true. Clearly, when Cory signed a 3 year deal, it must have included clauses allowing the club to reduce his money. That makes sense.

This the same pay cut that Sandercock was asked to take which the Chairman has today branded as ?

This just doesn't make any sense at all. Where about to announce significant investment in the club in the coming days. For me that doesn't lend itself to offering our better players reduced terms. No player would have a contract drawn up that could see him lose money at the discretion of the club that's just pure madness.

As I say, an impeccable source, who knows everything about our clubIt’s also said at Caravan Park by members of their Coaching team that despite the imminent new deal for Sandycock, Cory Pattison, faced with a pay cut next year, is leaving to go back to Australia at the end of the season.'"

Wilf is a peddler of hate towards Hull KR. His constant references to us as noisy neighbours shows him up for what he really is. I'd add that maybe if he also actually got down to Craven Park for the up and coming derby he'd realise that his constant references to MS3 Craven Park as Caravan Park are a few years behind the times.

Jeez the guy couldn't even get Patersons name correct.

Has Paterson come out and said he is leaving.

Why would he want to go to Salford for anything but money, it cannot be to win things.

We'll if enough quality players "Come for the money" we might actually win something.

Recipient of the Largest Salary Cap Breach of 2014 goes to.....

By enough you mean 17 right?

We've signed 4 and close to another 6 so that I think bearing in mind I wasn't great at maths makes err 10!!! So 10 players coming in 10 players going out.

And as I've said previously on another forum there's legal ways around the salary cap. Plus it's not a lawfully passed agreement meaning the RFL couldn't really do squat if it is broken otherwise they could find themselves in breach of restriction of trades act. See that's a loop hole that boys and girls.

Oh, you mean they cant enforce their own rules by giving you a fine and points deduction? Sweet.

A 'quality player' will set you back over 100k, depending on the quality it will be a lot more. A player is likely to want a lot more to play for Salford than he would for Wigan as the giving up of ambition will add a few quid to his contract, so I assume that to win things your chairman will have to actually break the cap in reality, rather than just gob off about it to achieve this aim.

You're right.....





You're Maths isn't great. You're still 7 short.

I really hope your owner has a better grasp of the salary cap & the governing body's powers than you pal. It will be a sad day for your club if he doesn't.

He's right about the fairly significant potential for cap avoidance, if not the wisdom of cap evasion, though.