As a man with 12000+ posts on this Forum, you surely know that edits aren't flagged up as new posts, Ergo - I didn't see your edit until you mentioned it.

I edited it prior to your post getting laid down. At the time I'm guessing you'd already quoted myself and was in the stages of posting a reply after checking my correct use of grammar.

If you didn't see I also edited my post above yours.

Quote Easty="Easty"OMG. The grammar police..... Yawn. BTW when was the last time I actually used been instead of being out of interest?'" viewtopic.php?f=59&t=524952&p=16835288&tsmp=1334163046#p16835288 Yesterday.

Quote Easty="Easty"OMG. The grammar police..... Yawn. BTW when was the last time I actually used been instead of being out of interest?'" viewtopic.php?f=59&t=524952&p=16835288&tsmp=1334163046#p16835288 Yesterday.

"Back? Whens he making his debut more importantly

London has being mentioned so two weeks away."

Classic.

Possibly on Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:04 pm




Double ganger.

And their was me thinking I'd actually improved on my grammar.

There.

Good one.

I'll let you off for starting a sentence with "And", It's more socially accepted these days. The other, That you did on purpose wasn't funny.

I like to start sentences with 'pickleweasel'.

FFS All this grammar is doing my head in.


Right whats wrong with this one above I've look been and being on the tinternet and I'm baffled.


This one above I know is obviously wrong.

Well, as you asked me (and Barney obliged) to find when you last used being instead of been, I think the clue is in your original question.

Although - You could have meant to write "London was being mentioned", Then being would be the correct choice.