Yes it is time to move on. No point having a chip on our shoulders.

So how do we think the !?@*}\~$ will screw us over [inext[/i week?

More seriously, the hanging thread from this is that Hudgell has claimed they inadvertently revealed that the appeal was judged before it was heard. That is very serious. IMO, the RFL need to deny that and charge Hudgell or, if it is true return JB's appeal bond, apologise to him, probably suspend those culpable and assure the RL community that mechanisms are in place to limit the risk of it happening again.

The rest, they can waffle away with 'after careful consideration, in our judgement, etc'. There's always going to be some subjectivity, but you have to be able to put your case before they make up their minds. Otherwise the whole thing is not just a sham, but obviously a sham, and that isn't sustainable.

Tbf when it comes to rovers and hull fc we always seem to get dry ummed with the rfl

No, we really don't.

I think Hull FC get a fair crack with the RFL tbh. What the hell you had to moan about since the Paea incident.

Must just be rovers they hate then. Can't say I they blame them

You are hereby on notice to be dropped from our proper squad for next week's Wakey home game, if you don't behave. I'll tell on ya to Stan.

I only let 4 in down my wing this week

Confirmed in today's League Express that the tribunal saw angles if the incident that have not been publicly released.
Would have been useful for the RFL to make this clear so that everyone knew the decision wasn't based on the footage we all saw, which was clearly inconclusive.

So why be so secret about it? And if so, was our club told about this 'new' evidence? I hope this evidence was sent to our club to assess.

Yes it would. Potentially makes a bit more sense. It'd be interesting to see them, but I doubt we will. Was it a long article? Were any of the other issues around process addressed?

Nonsense.

What League Express actually said was ' The Boudebza tackle didn't look deliberate or reckless however the RFL tribunal members PERHAPS saw angles that wern't available to the rest of us.

RLE goes on to say 'The question is, if Shenton had not been injured and had got up to play the ball would Boudebza's tackle have been put on report with a suspension following? It's hard to believe it would have been.'

I think you need to work on your inference skills! If they didn't have different angles, it wouldn't even have been mentioned.

So your going off a weekly league paper that prints that the rfl disciplinary panel 'perhaps' have an option for looking at a different angle?!.....my god, then it must be true.

You said this was 'Confirmed' in League Express now I have given the actual account you have had to reduce this to 'inference'.

IMO although you have downgraded 'confirmed' to 'inference' the truth is you should downgrade again to 'fiction'.

Martyn Sadler made it quite clear on TalkSport that he thought the Boudebza verdict was a total travesty, the only explanation being if the RFL had unseen footage unseen by anyone else including him.

So the film from the grassy knoll is still to turn up.
As before...it doesn't exist....and as before your either a WUM a Cyclops or it appears now both.