It makes me laugh how they think because he's gone they won't be paying any of his wages or contract payments oh yeah we will take that overpriced liability off your hands and pay him more than anyone else at the club I can really see cas doing that

Doesn't matter pal, once on loan his entire salary moves to Cas and off ours.

For the month Eden was on loan his entire years salary was counted on Salfords cap, now he's back it's back on yours. You seem to think that what you 'actually' pay them has any effect on the cap.

Read the rules.

Hey dunce, learn the rules before you spout your mouth. How much we're paying in subsidies and how the cap works are two different things.

A5 Signing of a New Player on Loan during the Salary Cap Year
Prior RSCM approval pursuant to Clause 6 shall be required where one Club proposes to temporarily transfer the playing registration of a Player to another Club. For purposes of determining whether or not approval should be granted, the temporary transfer will be treated as a permanent transfer, ie as if the Player has departed from the first Club (see Clause A4) and signed permanently for the second Club (see Clause A3).
Comment to Clause A5Any agreement reached between the Clubs as to who pays the Player’s salary (or any part thereof) has no relevance to the treatment of the Player in accordance with Clause A5, above.

A3 Signing of a New Player during the Salary Cap Year
Prior RSCM approval pursuant to Clause 6 is required where a Club proposes to enter into a Playing Contract with a new Player after the commencement of the Salary Cap Year. The RSCM will calculate the Salary Cap Value for that Player in accordance with Clause 4.
Comment to A3: For example, where a Player enters into a Playing Contract with a Club commencing on 1 June 2009 (i.e. 6 months into the 2009 Salary Cap Year) which provides that he will: (i) be paid a Gross guaranteed salary of £5,000 per month; (ii) receive benefits to the Gross value of £1,000 per month; and (iii) be paid £250 per appearance, for the purposes of these Regulations, the Salary Cap Value for that Player will be £76,500, calculated as follows:
(i) £60,000 (ie £5,000 salary per month x 12 months);
(ii) £12,000 (ie £1,000 benefits per month x 12 months); and
(iii) £4,500 (ie £250 per appearance x 18 assumed appearances: see Clause 4.5.3(a)).

A4 Termination of a Playing Contract during the Salary Cap Year
Prior RSCM approval pursuant to Clause 6 shall be required where a Club proposes to terminate the Playing Contract of a Player, whether pursuant to a transfer of that Player’s registration or otherwise. The RSCM shall formally approve such termination for purposes of Clause 6 and shall recalculate the Club’s Aggregate First Tier Liability and/or Aggregate Second Tier Liability in accordance with Clause 6.
Comment to Clause A4: If the departing Player was a First Tier Player, then the Player with the next highest Salary Cap Value outside of the Club’s First Tier Players will automatically become a First Tier Player for the purposes of the Regulations.

6 months? We only signed him in february I believe. I think the revolving door is to juggle the cap TBH but seems pointless to me as the best we can aspire to is 8th and a 1st round play off humiliation so we may as well stick with what we have unless we can bring in better players on longer term deals as we have sa.

How many years do you think j walker's legs will last as a prop in SL?

I don't think pearson really cares about paying towards their salaries as long as they're off the cap

Never said he did

ok dunce I never mentioned the cap I said you will be still paying some of his wages, contract payments never once mentioned the cap so read what I put before spouting your mouth off

I can't answer that, there doesn't appear any problems at the moment though. He could have 10 years in front of him, or 10 games.

You, me and everyone else who bothers to read this thread knew exactly what you meant. Because if it wasn't, why even mention about who's paying him when I'd directly spoke about it giving us room on the cap and nothing else?

Either you've got it wrong, or you've jumped to conclusions, which is it?

I think its you as I replied to jake and once again I never mentioned the cap

Strange that, because you posted this -

[i'It makes me laugh how they think because he's gone they won't be paying any of his wages or contract payments oh yeah we will take that overpriced liability off your hands and pay him more than anyone else at the club I can really see cas doing that'[/i

Well before Jake had even posted today.

It's alright though, we'll leave it here. Pretty obvious that you've jumped the gun about something you didn't fully understand. At least by not replying Stan has kept some dignity in being mistaken, fair play to him.

Go a bit further back and you will see my original reply to jake I didn't realise I was going to get the Spanish inquisition about a subject I don't honestly care about

Apology accepted.

Nice of you to admit you were wrong you might as well admit you were wrong about josh also while you at it