Quote: Sandro II Terrorista "Dixon is so far the better option it's not funny.
His passing game when chiming into the line is at least as good as Cockayne's, they're both liable to wang one into row Z.
They're both as liable to drop a kick on the sixth.
Dixon had to come a long, long, way for the one he dropped on Friday in a swirling wind and rain, one of the wings should have taken that.
Those are the negatives.
Dixon has searing pace, he's electric over five to fifteen metres. Cockayne isn't.
Dixon has fantastic footwork,he could pick a lock with his toes, Ratchford didn't get within a metre of him on Friday. A metre! As good as a mile.
Cockayne has never and will never go full length.
Dixon writes a goodbye letter to the opposition whilst doing this
There's absolutely nothing about personalities or previous indiscretions in that post.
We've got a solid plYer and a fantastic talent to choose from.
Cockayne didn't cut it for us on 2007, how relieved where we when we signed Briscoe?
The last point I would makemis that contrary to an earlier post, Cockayne is really not some sort of tactical genius when it comes to calling the defensive plays.
Both have vast improvement to make in this department, but one's thirty and the other twenty two.'"
Very good post which sums up perfectly imo the important differences between the two players and highlighting why on this occasion at least, Chester will hopefully opt for
Kieran Dixon at fullback against Catalan.
I'm wondering if Chris Chester may actually decide to have BC on the bench.
