will we see Hall or will Morgan opt for Charlie?

No reason why Hall wont get a game Charlie better coming of the bench wouldnt you say

Charlie played there and did well enough last season though.

I say stick Welham inside Fox and Hall inside Colbon replacing Welham.

Fox and Welham will be hard to defend against on the same side IMO and Hall will undoubtedly cause problems when asked to, Colbon might also get a pass(if he sits in the stands).

Justin is the king though, what he says I'll agree with,

By the way, the above post is not indicating my wish for a backs orgy.

it depends if fisher is fit, if not he'll probs bring hall to centre nd charlie on bench

If Raguin plays centre it will be interesting to see who Morgs puts in the centre to face him.

He'll almost certainly put Hall in the centre as a straight replacement for Webster. No ifs or buts, he has a ready made player who had a good off season and has been 18th man the past two games. Cockayne is being trained as a 13 and back up 9 so why put him to centre again where he was defensively shown up in the friendly against Huddersfield??

There was nothing to suggest there is a problem with a tackle?

I think the charge and guilty verdict says otherwise.

From where I was it looked like webster grabbed Rileys foot and twisted right round. You could see Riley was in alot of pain. The tackle had been completed and there was no other reason to do it than to cause injury. A proper sh*thouse thing to do. Two games isn't enough for trying to deliberately injure an opponent.

Okay thanks for that would be good to see obviously not to see Riley getting injured. And if that's the case the ban is justified and he has to accept that.

tackles are completed so fast now i dont think players even have time to think about what there gonna do,
proving someone has actually gone out to delibarely injure someone is hard to prove, it must be so hard to do as there are so many cameras at games now, that players would know they cant get away with it,

I think the lack of appeal and Justin's article in the HDM says a lot TBH, The RFL are still an inconsistent set of t#ssers anyway!

I dont get the HDM much now it's only 4 pages long and Justin probably thinks it's not worth appealing we've tried before it don't work, and your right they are full of head doers.

hes done something he shouldnt have, hes been caught, end of, do the 2 match ban.
as Morgan said though, the RFL have to be consistent and pull all of these dangerous tackles up.

Are head high tackles a sh*thouse thing to do?