Still confused as to how it cost Hull FC the game. Hull FC score from that and the rest of the match still stays the same and it's 24-24. But then you throw in drop goals and in fairness Rovers would have being favourites to knock a one pointer over.

Wasn't rovers winning 18-16 when the try was not given, which means it would have been 18-20/22 to Hull.

Agree you cant say it cost us the game with so long left to play but it did take the wind out of Hulls sails to go from being in front to conceding straight after that decision. If the try stood we would have had the momentum and been ahead in the game.

I can't remember would have to look back on sky but as we won 24-18 I'm guessing it couldn't have being 18-16 as you never kicked a penalty goal.

20-18 then with Dobson missing last kick, im sure we were only 2 behind when that try wasnt given.

You'd have been stood behind the sticks watching tickle knock over the 2 at the time webster was scoring your last try. If it had been given we'd have gone on to score another couple of tries. Momentum was with us and you were hanging on at the time

Are you stating that sequence of events as fact Jake? Please send me next week's winning lottery numbers.

I was stood between the 40 & 30M line and the ball travelled forward even from the line were I was looking so it was the correct decision though I can understand other people not as well placed as me having a different view.

At the end of the day, it's yet [ianother[/i derby win and all FC can do is clutch at straws...

10 5 6 42 24 18

Course it was

You are Richard Agar and I claim my £5 and derby victory.

Wish I was, my resignation letter would be on rule's desk 1st thing tomorrow