no debate I already said Kelly atm is a better player,i also believe sneyd is getting better and better and we are far a better team when he plays

Different types of players, would make a great partnership, which obviously won't happen, Sneyd has been great for us and without him we would be in the bottom two, he could be a great hull player for the next 7/8 years, you just have to enjoy Kelly for the next 18 months.

Back on topic, I'd say it's highly unlikely to happen reading his latest tweets.

Be a great signing for you and a bad move for us if it was to happen.

100% fit according to your coach

He also said campese would be back the week after he did his knee and Lunt would be fit every week for about six weeks so I'd take whatever Chester says about injured players with a pinch of salt

A better comparison would be Campese-Sneyd & Kelly-Pryce. In which case you guys obviously have the better pair. Problem is just keeping them on the field together.

It won't happen but would be a severe misplacement of resources if we did. We need quality second row and a hard big prop. Nothing wrong with our back line except maybe a centre.

We Don't, its a rumour

The same kid who left Shaul for dead as he breezed passed him. Even had time for a little dance after scoring.

You do realise Sneyd missed the first Derby?

It was also the only one where Kelly & Campese played together. Cause & effect?

I used that game as a example because that's the only game I've seen you play but looking at your results and near misses if you had Kelly in your team you would of won all them near misses