Magnets.

Looking at the 2 incidents if Poore can be singled out then how the hell can number 27 for Widnes not be?
Booth are the ones with a stooped back in those clips.

Hudgell is bang on if more spoke up from other clubs and refused to pay any fines for doing so what else would they do we all have a right to free speech or arn't we a democracy anymore all fans and clubs want is consistency on and off the field then nobody would feel the need to speak out

God bless you hudge for having the balls to stand up to the rfl. Its only a pity other cowardly chairman dont do the same.

I'm with him 100%

In denial .

Your chairman is a great leader. He should be part of a new leadership team heading up the RFL

www.ipetitions.com/petition/RFL-change

www.ipetitions.com/petition/RFL-change

Come on every body sign this it might do some good you never know

It needs sorting we had Collis get a 2 match ban for a careless tackle on Gaskill and that didn't look anything like Amor throwing the haymaker he did on Sunday and Amor gets 1 game ?.Have a look on official Wakey site near the end of the game that haymaker was thrown with full intent but gets 1 game.Well said Hudgell needs some more to stand up and be counted.

I saw the Amor one on SL Fulltime. Given the refs positioning, I can't fathom how he managed to stay on the pitch. To compound that error with a 1 game ban is ridiculous, unless they reverted back to the "Bowen scale", in which case he was hard done to!

You're absolutely right, no way in my eyes that the ref could not see that happen, he was looking straight at it.
This is then compounded by the match review panel grading it as "[iB-C Reckless – tackler in control[/i " as opposed to "[iD-F Intentional – clenched fist – intent to make contact with head[/i" or
"[iD-F Intentional – stiff arm tackle – no attempt to tackle legitimately – violent[/i"

How anyone can watch the video and tell me that is not INTENTIONAL from Amor is beyond belief.


Same with comparing the Poore incident with the Whiting one - No difference in my opinion (except one on Whiting actually looks worse) but treated completely differently.
What do these people do when reviewing the matches? Because they're clearly not looking at the physical evidence.

Most annoying thing for me is refs copping out in the games and using the on report. They should get rid of it IMO and refs should be encouraged to send off for blatant foul play. Do that and it would significantly reduce withing a few weeks

Well i suppose it was to be expected... www.hulldailymail.co.uk/RFL-char ... story.html

Well i suppose it was to be expected... www.hulldailymail.co.uk/RFL-char ... story.html