:1efzmssy




simples

Most excellent spin. He's still gash though and he still plays for your team. On the plus side, he did wiggle his Iestyn at me during The Derby after Newton's try, so all good.

He picked you out of everyone in the North Stand? You, and you alone? How do you know this? Avian visual acuity, or just wishful thinking?



I sometimes think Yeaman's stance, hands on hips on the left hand touchline in front of me during a break in play is the equivalent of a Joey Tribbiani "How you doin'?" directed at me, but I'm starting to doubt myself now you're thinking Radford is adopting the same tactic with you. It sounds so silly.

im glad hes staying at Hull, hes not what we need at all. he only lastged 12 minutes against Wire before been subbed, whats that all about???

So glad you are pleased, even more so that you are not at all concerned about that 2nd year, when he will be 33 and shot to !

Reading the umpteen page thread on dulls board about Radford it seems a lot are concerned he has been given a two year deal. Its good if he did a Moa and used Rovers interest to secure a good pay rise aswell....and long may it last.

A bit, but look at Menzies. Plus Radders stats (appearances vs possible appearances) over the last 5 seasons. Not too shabby.



2006 31/32
2007 31/32
2008 29/32
2009 27/28
2010 25/27

Im not to good with figures Mrs B, so perhaps you could help



Does the above table show then without doubt that the older Radford gets the less games he manages

Possibly. He played a lot of minutes in the last derby though. Despite Hull's pack missing our 2 marquee players and Rovers pack being full strength, his rather poor effort was still good enough.

Is that what you would call an attempted attention deflection by any chance?

Deflection of what? See my posts on Radford earlier in the thread - decent player. 2 years is in all likelihood too long but it's not breaking any rules or anything.

Everyone loves a goose. That is all.