You been smoking something?

Yeah ,,,,,Want some,,,?

Nah, talk to frank.

And in a nutshell we can now see why video refs aint allowed to rule on forward passes. TV looks flat at worst, but I was stood level with the 20 metre line and it was as clear as day. Silverwood was directly in my line of sight and called it 100% correct.

I was just amazed that he saw it though!

rubbish!

I know it must be hard to admit it but that pass was not forward.

Some you win some you lose and we will take it on the chin but a foward pass it wasnt.

If people listen to KCFM Action Replay on Monday Night at 7 they will get my view on it

















Not forward.
Wrong decision.

:1rqf256u


And your patronising quote below is reason that I dont and wont listen to KCFM commentary.
Impartiality is a pre-requiste of a [i:1rqf256u'GOOD' [/i:1rqf256ucommentator, sadly for you in your case that isn't so. You let yourself and the radio station down greatly.

:1rqf256uAt the end of the day 6 points or 60 its a W

Still confused as to how it cost Hull FC the game. Hull FC score from that and the rest of the match still stays the same and it's 24-24. But then you throw in drop goals and in fairness Rovers would have being favourites to knock a one pointer over.

Wasn't rovers winning 18-16 when the try was not given, which means it would have been 18-20/22 to Hull.

Agree you cant say it cost us the game with so long left to play but it did take the wind out of Hulls sails to go from being in front to conceding straight after that decision. If the try stood we would have had the momentum and been ahead in the game.

I can't remember would have to look back on sky but as we won 24-18 I'm guessing it couldn't have being 18-16 as you never kicked a penalty goal.

20-18 then with Dobson missing last kick, im sure we were only 2 behind when that try wasnt given.