sorry Balearic if you pause it when hall passes then again when Raynor collects with his arms at full stretch than it is clearly forward no arguments

Hope you don't mind cheeky charlie but i've used your idea for my sig, to good to miss out on

It looks forward, marginally, from that angle and even then there is the argument of momentum which is clearly talked about in the rule book. However how many times in a game have you seen a video reply of a try from multiple angles where one angle suggests a pass was forward and the others don't (or vice versa)?.. Happens all the time, which is why the ref's and touch judge's opinions are all that matters. I think its most gauling for us FC fans for the fact that you will see Silverwood and his touch judges apparently miss quite a few borderline passes per match.

Its fish and chip paper anyway. It didn't decide the match. If Hull had scored then the game was still far from over, it could have gone either way.

Better than spending all day on here or trolling through past threads or even just spending all day working out facts and figures

Is that why you Gateshull fans appear to be stumped !!!

And most of your players are L.B.W ( Legless. Before. Weekend)



credit where credits due though all the other Gateshull lot ( Robbo 4 , FC gimp, Barista, FC till i die , etc etc ) have gone A.W.O.L, but you remain .......and not to mention Hutchie the Gateshull fans media spokesperson who totally fooked up media relations for the Gateshull fans after he got "MEDIA HUNGRY" and peed the board off so they cut all ties with him

I'm with you on that

Watching superleague show today Hudds 1st try looked a bit forward