Quote Digger_the_Dog="Digger_the_Dog"Asking the Council to help a business increase their profits by handing them millions of tax payers money? Yep, well thought through campaign this.
'"
If they were spinning it like that, then I'd agree it'd be foolish. But they have stressed the community aspect of things. Council's and local authorities the world over have been effectively subsidizing private sports clubs for a long time - from Real Madrid downwards. It is ultimately a political, not a business choice.
Remember as well (how could you forget?!), that Rovers need to cut their losses before they increase their profits - it isn't like some fat cat will be making tons of cash from the much-loved local treasure that is Hull KR, in the forseeable.
Tbh, if it comes down to a choice between playing at the KC and becoming a community-club in the Championships, I'd look at the former - but how many sports stadia host 3 senior clubs? Offering to help out at CP, in return for their own facilities, maybe a share of rent/income and a community commitment (share with an amateur RL club, or a RU one perhaps), has got to be a decent option for the council, if the price is right.
To some extent, I think the option of a switch to the KC is worth leaving open for now. Hull fans, who'll form a political counterweight to this campaign, don't want Rovers moving in, I suspect. If that is the alternative way to secure a SL licence long-term, this might seem more palatable to them - as it is for Rovers, and everyone is happy.
