Quite

and not picking on him in particular but i never like the fact that players,esp young players refer to the coach by a nickname/shortened version.

What's shortening the name of Ur coach got to do with how they play very bizarre comment that seen as all Ur team call Ur coach "rich"

hutchie thinks he should be called sir obviously

I agree with that.

imo it depends on the boss, if he's happy to be called morgs rather than justin or mr morgan or boss or whatever, thats the boss's take on it. some do like to have a ranking others like to muck in, personally i dont think either is wrong as long as respect for the gaffer is there, i've played to a decent level and had both these scenario's. as long as respect is there it doesn't matter. in fact the only time it wasn't there was when the coach though he was above us and nicknames were out

Actually sir Morgan has a ring to it

You have to remember that Louis is only 18, he isn't a big lad that can back up week in week out, sure some players came through when they were 16 but not many full backs do.

I am sure he will play very well if/when picked and he's done nothing to say he wont get another game this season so if he doesnt get in this weekend I don't think it will have anything to do with the 'quins game but more to do with not burning him out too soon.

He looked very good in attack and defended admirably for a debut at full back although he did look small and that showed when trying to defend against bigger blokes. This will take its toll on him if played regularly but I am sure the coach is more than qualified to make the correct decision on this one, he's not done such a bad job with Scotty, Ben and other youngsters that he's nurtured!

Sheriff trains with the first team every day, would it not seem strange to you having all his team mates refer to Justin as "Morgs" and him having to call him "Mr Morgan?"
Just seems as though it would alienate the youngsters rather than making them welcome.

you cant play him in the same team as Ben Cockayne anymore, too many people around me were getting them confused, (not me of course)

thought he did very well, (apart from Luke Dorns try)

Really? They don't look remotely alike and Sheriff has the Sinfieldesque biceps guards for easy identification.

Although I mentioned it, I don't think he could have done all that much about Dorn, he had the whole pitch to play with as no one was covering after bursting through the middle.

I was also wrong about his good attempted last ditch tackle. It wasn't on Karl "Cheese n" Temata, it was on Oliver "people say there's enough players for an expanded competition yet this useless donkey is supposedly a starting Super League prop despite being gash years ago at Widnes (was it?) when we were still in NL1" Wilkes.

Not sure that nickname will catch on as well as j. hunter hullkr's will for Cheese n.

Oli Wilkes was a big big player in the NL1 GF and was one of the best forwards on the park. He may not be a top of SL player but he does a solid job a bit like Richard Moore.

Give over. I think like the way you think about the majority of things but Wilkes is and always will be rubbish.

He's weighing at what? Two hundred kilos and he broke a line from your mates sloppy tackling a the weekend.

Wonder what Morgs thought of him tonight

Cracked under pressure but I wouldn't want to line up against Brough's kicking game so early in my SL career. He'll improve. Showed good hands to set up Newton.

tbh i felt sorry for him, he had no protection under the high balls, where was our players blocking runners? just been in the way of runners and giving him a little more time? Hes a tough LITTLE kid, and at least he wont have to face a kicker of that quality every week