I think they have just got it wrong!

2 whole seating sections are outside the touchline. Bizarre

Agreed.

The East Stand is a decent stand, so I'd have built the North Stand close to the East Stand. Then in time I'd have just knocked down the RM Stand, moved the pitch eastwards and built a full length West Stand. The South Stand then could have been built in time to complete the ground and allowed the away fans a decent view.

Font
You cannot be seriously making that suggestion

I think it's the angle playing tricks on us

I am glad someone else can see it, someone has got this very wrong.

NH should ask for discount, someone needs to be taken to task for this!!

Its not on, this project has cost millions and they cant even follow a blue print!

Are you serious?

Surely the picture is an 'artists impression'... perhaps he was on the pop?

He certainly is. . .astonishing, eh!

There is plenty of room to bring the pitch closer to to the RM stand which must be the idea.

The idiocy of people is truely amazing.

Because of the flat walkway infront of the seats of the RM Stand, it would be impossible to bring the pitch closer, even now the hand rail on the stand is in your eyeline with the touchline, so to bring it closer would block half of the pitch of (it may have been a good idea at times last season).

The stand does indeed look short on the east side, but there is a stairway to go on the end and the side structure of the stand where it will meet up with the East stand, closing that end of the gound off (why would you put more seats behind the end of the east stand with no view?) secondly why would you make sure the stand was even on both sides, that would mean it falling short of the ancillary buildings on the West side, and those extra seats are not a restricted view, so no problem.