Bradford are to big to lose.

Thankfully the clubs and league have realised that.

You don't get bigger than Rangers in the SPL.

It seems the clubs and the SPL did'nt realise that.

It's exactly the same, you're right.

The SPL will be moaning soon enough.

If Wakefield hadn't got a buyer, would they have been "to big to lose" or would they have been allowed to go to the wall?

Unfortunately to the wall, which would have been a real shame looking at their attendances this season.

They've also brought through some very good youngsters.

Not having a go here, but what your saying then is if you're a big club and you mis-manage your finances, we'll save you for the good of the game, if you're a small club and do the same....

Yep, the smaller clubs can be replaced with other sides.

Our game isn't big enough to lose the big sides.

This isn't football.

They are not a big side for christ sake. They are not too big to fail. Life and SL would go on happily. There crowd sizes have always been inflated due to cheap season tickets and freebies. Yes they've won SL a few times but SL wouldn't miss them.

Well it's a good job for them the rfl and sl clubs don't agree with you.

Their fans wouldn't lose out, they could just go to the next cheapest place, Huddersfield.

I'm reserving judgement on this until the finer details of the package are released, but my initial concern is shrouded in 'conflict of interest'.

On the issue of 'saving' a big club, I seem to remember the RFL getting involved to save Wigan from relegation; an intervention which facilitated Noble and Fielding moving from the Bulls to Wigan. The rest is history - Wigan haven't looked back but the same cannot be said about the Bulls!!!!

I remember when we was in sh--e street they did not rush to help us it was instead talks of merger with hull now they are pleased we did not because of gates when we go away