hmmmmmm, boycotting a paper that happens to be printing stories about a rugby player fom HULL, madness... stories sell papers and your little cry baby statement about charlie the thug and the fact that the papers wont leave him alone, you are a proper numpty... go find a dark little corner and go have a cry to yourself, what a flannel...

Whats wrong with this article FFS

This is an example of "sensationalism"The Mail called chairman Neil Hudgell to ask if Cockayne will be available to play for the reserves during his suspension.

We also wished Mr Hudgell to comment as to whether Cockayne can be considered suspended when still training. '"

Because, the facts arethey[/i feel fits the crime (which at the end of the day is all that matters really)

- Rovers have since punished him in a manner they feel is appropriate

That, therefore should be the end of the matter. But no, the HDM have to sensationalise it with CCTV clips, headline banners, two interviews with the victim (which again IMO they didn't need to do), and constant little digs at Cockayne and the club. The way they talk in paper it's clear that they feel they have a right to constant information, co-operation etc from the club, which I don't feel they do.
Bottom line is they're a s****y little rag who actually only care about one team in Hull (and it isn't either RL team unfortunately), and who IMO have treated both RL teams like crap for years, and so deserve nothing in return.
The Cockayne 'saga' is none of their business really - it was a crime on a person not from the city, and did not happen in the city, but they (as with the Raynor case and others) feel they 'have to' make it their business. They then b***h when any club doesn't fully cooperate with them, but I don't blame any club, and if I was Hull/Rovers I'd cut ties with them - neither club needs their 'publicity' (especially when it's negative so often) these days anyway.
Sorry for the rant.

Suspensions by the RFL can include training sessions, and have in the past.

Don't think it's ever the case with club suspensions though.

thye are just clarifying for interested fans and readers, if Grudgill had stated it more clearly the first time they would not have to.

And why has it taken himover a week to restart training then