because they shouldn't be matched?

whys vella with horne?
whys manu with netherton?
whys crocker with gene?
etc,etc,etc

Yes, thats one reason but also I disagree on some that do match up.

so your in the tony camp as well?

Quite a few could have been argued Murrell/Washbrook being one but the Galea/Tickle comparision was by far the most incorrect.
Crocker;s international and SOO record would say he is better then Galea but Ben is far more important to Rovers then Crocker could be simply because Morgan likes to play expansive rugby and Ben Galea is pivitol to that.
Hull are much more a forwards orientated style of play and with Jon Sharp now on board that is unlikely to change much.

Morgan would take Crocker over Galea in a heartbeat. Crocker is definitely superior to Galea.

Know that for certain do you.
Horses for courses.
Galea fits into the Rovers pattern of play like a dream.
Player of the Season and Players Player proves that.
I did not argue Crocker's credentials but i doubt Morgan would swap Galea.
He is far too important.
When he was injured last year it had a massive effect, when he returned the form lifted.

Leeds
Saints
Hull
Wigan
Warrington
Catalans
Huddersfield
Hull KR
Bradford
Wakefield
Castelford
Salford
Harlequins
Celtic

That is a joke right, SCF?

No mate why?

I really like Galea, but you put hand on heart, you would have Crocker.

Read the posts ive made and you get your answer.
Ive read many Aussie articles in which Galea is referred to as very unlucky not to have Rep honours against his name so Crocker is hardly several classes above him.
And if Horne or Thorman get injured you are unlikely to see Crocker lead your team around the park in the way Ben has shown he can from off half.
In addition there is still a slight doubt over Crocker's fitness and the big injuries he has sustained through his career so no i wouldnt.

Hull-3rd
Bradford-9th
Quins-13th

We was offered Crocker but with 2 reconstructions on both shoulders we thought better leave him alone.