Not as funny as you.

I don't think the players thought that at all simply because we've played that long without him and played well Kelly was more important last season and imo Blair is a lot ore important this season

Any thoughts on campese or webbo as coach mate ?

Why, thank you my learned friend

It wasn't a compliment, you numpty

So, you've proved yourself a d1ck on the Leigh board. Are you trying it on all the boards?

You took a gamble on him & unfortunately it hasn't come off, his game management is second to none, I would look at paying him off now, we had so many crocked halfs we've taken chances with, it's painful as you know that this pivot changes a lot of onfield but for one reason or another cant keep fit.

Campo is class, we will need him on the run to Wembley, but not until after the Oldham game.
When we have Campo and Kelly in the halves, Blair at loose forward or second row, Lunt settled into the side and our big fast forwards rolling on we will be a match for any team.
We're a third of the way through this season and there hasn't been a trophy handed out yet. We may make the top eight but I doubt if we could get to the grand final now, so lets get them fit and play for another Wembley appearance with all of our big guns playing to the best of their abilities.
Don't rush them back as there is no need.

I like your outlook, that's the way to go,

Websters doing a decent job the players have reacted positively and that's the main thing

I really hate myself for going all grammar police as it really doesn't matter, but, ellipsis, three dots. Three. Not four. Three.

Apologies for my awful post Mr. spegs.

I do actually, but that's irrelevant.

Performances, ifs and maybes don't count for much. Results are what ultimately count and the league table doesn't ever lie..... and I learnt that before I left Primary School.

"Marsh better than Kelly. Not now and I'd wager probably never" ......My reasoning went way over your head.

Kelly is an established half-back (Super League standard at least), but he always seem to be conveniently fit for the big games and has desires to return to the NRL, whereas Marsh is a young player learning the game, getting better with every game he plays and is grateful to be a member of the Hull KR squad ……And, regarding the halves, Kelly and Marsh are not comparable ……Kelly is an off the cuff player (his role within the halves is currently being implemented by Blair after Webster told Blair to play to his strengths, and we have seen Blair play his best games for us in the halves since Webster told him to play off the cuff and attack the line) whereas Marsh’s game is a controller that guides the team around the park and implements game management …….To put it simply, Kelly is comparable to Blair and Campese is comparable to Marsh …….Given our injury woes, which half back combination would you prefer to see the season out?

I've yet to see marsh do any game management even though there different styles you'd have Kelly over marsh any day out of the four you've mentioned Blair is the most important by a mile at the moment