Allegedly he was one of the highest paid squad members last season. Equal to many aussies. Even on an increase, Welham would have been on a lot less. Welham scored more and their defence was comparable.

Welham was really bad at jumping out of the line, the rest of his game was average to good with the occasional bit of attacking excellence. Came from the same skill set as Craig Hall.

So you don't know anything about the ridiculous payment then.

It stands to reason that an external new signing would demand a high wage when moving to a new employer and several teams were after him. There is no doubt in my mind that Welham woukd have been cheaper to retain as a home grown employee. Its the same in all businesses (except in the public sector). In the end Thornley offered no more than Welham.

But then again, hindsight is a wonderful thing. Oh well.

Thornley was a far better centre than Welham

Thought his defense was shoddy at times but to me unlike Welham, Thornley would do better in a better side.

So a ridiculous figure is now a high wage.

Reports elsewhere claimed he was on the top end of the wage bill. I have no internal insight whatsoever into the inner working at the club. I am a mere supporter, just like you, and have been for 30+ years.

However it stands to reason we paid a large salary for an ex-wigan centre who was reported to be hunted by several SL clubs at the time than is likely Welham was demanding, yet was actually no better that Welham.

As I said, hindsight is a wonderful thing. At the time it probably looked like a good deal but didn't turn out that way.

I accept that.

The only point I was trying to make was that you used the word ridiculous without saying what you deemed to be a rediculous amount or any evidence of what the salary actually was.

You appeared to be making a dig about our club without any evidence to support your assertions. Your subsequent posts seem to confirm this.

Confirm that I'm not allowed to have an opinion based on the limited evidence available to me? The evidence may be limited or weak but that doesn't stop you having an opinion.

Anyway, welham was OK and loved to intercept the ball. The fact that his success rate at doing so was low and left gaping holes in the line was his undoing. I guess this hasn't changed whilst at Bradford. Thornley wasn't the player we expected him to be (based on what I saw of him on the pitch).

Minns isn't perfect, but better than both of them. Wether that continues this season, we can only hope.

Thornley looked disinterested at best! Kris was a great servant , thornley doesn't deserve to be in the same post as Kris really, but neither will be missed in my opinion.

We all have opinions and express them, some even based on limited evidence. You however appear to have based your opinion about Thornley being paid a ridiculous amount on no actual evidence at all.