That's probably the 17 I'd go with.

No room for Larroyer in the team picked by you and Goose.

I bet Chezzie picks him though.

Larroyer is totally out of form so I'd leave him out, however I agree that CC will find a spot for him.

I think it all depends on whether he gambles on playing Chisholm alongside Kelly. Blair in the 2nd row will give him the luxury of dropping a back rower and on form alone, that has to be Larroyer

Don't need no grammar lessons from no goose

rlBoth acceptablerl

You were a lot better without larroyer at saints on friday

If you want to be American, that's fine.

The rest of us will just stick to speaking properly.

Same for me, Hornes worst games were when he was at centre and his defence goes to pot. Salter hasn't had a great couple of games but lets be honest he's not been on his own in that. Dixon at FB is a must, Wire aren't renowned for defence so we need a threat in the side and if we can get some middle field position then Dixon coming into the line will worry them.

Chisolm is the hard question to answer, he looked ok in patches at the weekend but also flagged very quickly and his decision making went to awry with it. He looked pretty rusty and aside from a long cut out pass offered little. Now he only had limitted time with the team pre-match but the question is will another week have made that much difference. I'm kind of thinking we have to risk him now, but i do wonder how much more he'll offer than Marsh would have.

Chisolm is the question really. He can play FB. If he plays where on earth do you play Dixon/Cockayne?
Dixon to FB, Chisolm seems the most realistic. Maybe he goes Ben on the wing with Sio in centre? (thats a massive waste in my opinion of Sio).

Chisolm showed glimpses of what he could do, Kelly back in there is a massive difference, they both like to run so could run riot given half a chance.

Its great to actually have options and leave them guessing to a degree.

shore is the americanism. Are you a canada goose by any chance?

Westwood & Russell confirmed as missing for Wire. Might make it a tad closer.

Massive losses for them. Their form has improved a lot since russell came back. Fancy you to sneak this in a high scoring game

I was prepared to let this go, but, as you continue to once again make a massive gormclops of yourself, I ask you to provide evidence other than the frankly hilarious "Wiktionary".

Try the OED, I'll save you the bother, it isn't there.

i don't see the point in signing chisholm to not play him. The worst that can happen is we are crap and it doesn't work, not exactly on fire at the moment creatively are we. Plus it allows blair to second row, which i recall chester saying a couple of weeks a go is a necessity.

Their starting props are dangerous, but when they make changes not so good. i'd fight fire with fire and start french john as defensively i think he is stronger then lunt. Both charlie and dixon will make mistakes, however only one provides a genuine threat.

I would play Horne at centre, i dont think there centres are exactly fleetfooted in atkins/monaghan/bridge and he is our best chance of feeding sio.

1) Dixon
2) Sio
3) Horne
4) welham
5) Mantellato
6) Chisholm
7) Kelly
walker
9) Boubedza
10) Tony P
11) Larroyer
12) Blair
13) Mccarthy

14) Tilse ( needs a big game )
15) Green
16) Lunt
17) Donaldson

However, if salter does play, horne into second row, larroyer on bench and donaldson drops out i would not complain to much about that

I don't need to prove it. Do you think a lazy reference to the seaside is an English phrase? Poor, even from a duck. Sure as in (make) sure it up