Given the biased referee decisions as usual, I'm living ###### off with Rovers with not going for the two when needed. Seems to me Sandercock doesn't have total control over matters on the pitch when it counts. A point, yes. But should of been two.

Cant blame sandercock ultimately its the players who call if its kick or run. Sandy will be furious with that and I'd expect a bit of a roasting

Maybe, maybe not. But what ever the coach says, goes. Didn't today. Seems to me a lack of respect of the coaches position to me!

Sat in car park but anyone screaming "take the 2" wasn't here. The wind was strong in our faces, we wouldn't have kicked it, not a chance.

If the coach wants it, then regardless of what ever position your in, it goes!

If the kicker makes the decision because he knows he wont reach you have to go with it,as stan says he had no chance of reaching.

Sandy didn't sound happy with Keating

The commentators on RH couldn't believe they didn't go for it. Ill bow to your better judgement if you was there. But as I heard it, the coach was sending on the kicking tee to go for it. Now who's in charge of the team, Craig or Travis?

Apparently Neil Hudgell has been rushed to hospital following that ferocious bumming from Bentham. The RFL have charged him a grand medical fees to add insult to bleeding injury.

My mate rang me after the game and said it was bang into the wind and sir stan confirms it.I was of the same opinion as you listening to it,but coaches and commentators dont kick goals,travis does.

My point des, is that if it was a forlorn request by Craig, shouldn't Travis of gone for it at least?

In a word, no.

So who is in charge of the team???