I wasn't too far from the incident and felt that Briscoe knocked on. Was relieved he didn't give it but left me and more then a few overs quite baffled.

And we benefited from the decision you really are obsessed

nearly as baffled as when their player made that break and was allowed to play on when he was clearly tackled, just seen it on boots n all the tries. its comical. he's about 4 yards away (10/10 mr thaler for keeping up with play) but to say play on is a joke, scott murrell went to marker and they had a player waiting for the ptb. then people wonder why some of think its personal with him and rovers.

Was that the one where Joel Tompkins is clearly tackled by Briscoe and Thaler lets play go on even though we got penalised for moving off the mark in the first half?
That Joel Tompkins decision you mean?

thats the one!!!

thats the one!!!

watch boots n all the tries. think you may well think again that it was correct.

I think a visit to spec savers is in order mate.

Briscoe brought Tompkins down but he certainly doesn't look to be held. Tompkins was entitled to get up and play on and the fact the only complaints about it came from the crowd kinda says it all.

I'd be more worried about the terrible marker defence at the next play.

Mate your seeing things.

If it was so blatent why no protests from the players at such a key moment in the game?? They're a hell of a lot closer to the action than you or i, yet not one dickie bird from them.

The decision was 100% correct.

Its Thaler.

Your point being??

They probably expected it.

Now you're being silly.

Not really.