My first thought was the quota. Are you not full yet?

There are some unfounded rumours that Clintons been knocked back for a visa, so Solomona might be a back up plan. Would also be a lot cheaper to enable another signing.

Poster on the wire board, reckon he is going to crusaders ??

Who knows if the rumours about Clinton are true I would imagine Morgan has some kind of back up plans.

3 - 4 years ago i would have been doing cartwheels at the thought of signing him.
Not now though.

ermmm must resist.

Could be a handy signing. He's a tackle busting off loading kind of player which is something we are lacking.

A non starter unless Mills and Fisher are off-loaded. That would free up a chunk of cash and an extra quota spot. Its a shame Brian Noble has stopped answering Justins calls..

I would pay good money to see that.

Fisher's supposed to have been your best hooker in pre season. Why does Morgan want rid?

urban legend has it that he was Hull bound if Wakefield had lost the relegation decider to Castleford (we weren't willing to pay a transfer fee) but judging by his form the last few seasons, we made a lucky escape.

I think Solo would have been able to apply for fed trained status mate.

Certainly well fed?!

Which pre-season?
I have been to all 4 pre season games and am very comfortable with Murrell/Hodgson hooking with Spaven/Cockayne providing back-up and Powley/Gay and Gay waiting in the wings.

Solomona - biggest disappointment for Bulls in recent years, barring the Harris total utter unmitigated disaster. You can do far better IMO, but if you did sign him make sure you increase the weekly pie order by an order of magnitude.

Fair enough, but I have seen comments from more than one Rovers supporter that Rovers looked better with Fisher at hooker and that Morgan should "get over it". Personally I think that there's a lot of quality at hooker in the comp and this is one area Rovers might struggle. Haven't seen as much of Murrell at hooker to see how he might measure up vs Cunningham, Buderus, L'Estrange etc but you seem very confident and I'm sure that confidence won't just be bluster to divert from the question of why Morgan wants rid of a contracted player supposedly.