Why the hell are people so bothered about this?? The club were never going to be 'in profit' at a stage where a lot money was being spent in order for the club to progress as far as it has. Speculate to accumulate etc etc blah blah.

At the end of the day the club has a license for the next 3 seasons, it now has a decent average attendance and the team looks like its the strongest it's been in over 20 years.

As long as the club doesn't get in to the state it did back in the 90s, lets just enjoy it. Fans shouldn't take things so personally and start throwing childish insults, banter is a good thing but actually insulting each other over something so trivial is pathetic. People need to stop being so OTT and start realising whats more important in life.

Rant over

There is no absolute proof that this person exists unless long term liabilities (£737k) are made up of directors loans from the said 'person' which would lessen the overall net liability somewhat in the short/medium term.

Also if you want a direct comparison with the performance of Hull you would have to look at Hulls books after their first S/L season, the season which these accounts are produced for. Remember Hull have had 7 years of S/L handouts to get where they are now.

Neither Clubs accounts make particularly good reading but nor do most RL clubs, and with Hull about to commit £2m to their training facility i would say theirs are about to take a turn for the worse as there is no evidence that this money can be raised without considerable borrowing, thus incurring more debt.

Indeed.

That on top of the merger money and the proceeds from the sale of the Boulevard

So not hand-outs then.

Depends how you look at it. It was said when Rovers asked for £100k a few months back that it was Rovers asking for a handout.

Now you want to change the rules.

Wasn't just Rovers though was it, asking for an advanced handout.

Wrong again, Hull KR accepted an offer that was made by the RFL of an advance in payment, the offer was made to ALL S/L clubs due to the financial climate.

Good job Hull KR accepted isn't it considering the kooga fiasco

Wrong AGAIN.

Unlike our Chairman who denied this on a radio interview, the silence from his counterpart at Hull speaks volumes.

You're correct it was.