Yes, therefore illegal.

The laws of the game were broken and players and clubs alike are suppose to obey the governing laws of the game otherwise the whole thing is pointless.

Nobody said anything about UK law. The outcome of that, if Hull FC choose to follow up on it, remains to be seen.

Yes actually!!



His actual word 'my dad wants me to go to rovers but i dont i want to stay here'

In a way, I agree with you, and incidentally the four players you mentioned are the four most speculated to be leaving before next season.

Although I think Webster and Fisher are better than you think, I agree that Berrigan is a class above. But like I said in my earlier post, it didn't simply come down to 'is he good enough'. Releasing Gene or Aizue would've been a loss because we're light as it is for forwards. They're not in the same league granted, but we did have Fisher, Netherton, Cockayne & Webster who could play hooker.

Theres always a chance that the advice given to JM was regarding his fitness or an injury he may be carrying, rather than it being an attitude or ability issue. Also, at the risk of throwing some credibility my rival's way, even if we had offered him a deal, he could've turned us down for another club.

I think you're missing the point because as I've said countless times, most Rovers fans would love to have him, and rate him very highly, but there was simply a number of reasons why we didn't/couldn't put an offer in for him.

i understand that,

and what i am saying is i still believe it to be a mistake,

there are very very few half backs/utilities with Berrigans abilty, even fewer in this country,

and again, fewer likely to come over from Australia next year,

for the position you were in, a Berrigan type of player was needed, and very few come available

It is flattering that you choose those clubs to compare us with. We have come along way!

I know that 'just' reaching the play-offs would not count as 'doing something' for Leeds this year, but Rovers are in a different stage in their development.

Adding Berrigan to Rovers squad would of course improve it, but we needed improvement in more than one area, with 3 or 4 very good players rather than one World-class player.

Oh FFS. The last bit was a joke. Get your head of our your backside (by the way that was a joke as well)

Fair enough

its not particularly a complement, all teams have to be compared to Leeds and Saints as they are the best,

next year they will be compared to whichever were the best this year



the thing is, according to your fans your not spending the SC this season, + you could get rid of one of Fisher and Webster who whilst probably not big earners now, they will have been when in NL1 and so on a decent wage,

why not spend that on Berrigan?

also, whilst i understand your point re development of the team, at some stage you need an international class halfback and an international class hooker, you have neither of those, and they rarely come on the market,

before Berrigan and Tommy Lueluai when was the last move involving an SL club which included an internationally class half back?

Yes.

Can't disagree with much of that. Webster and Fisher were both under contract for 2008, but I suppose Jim Gannon was as well. Berrigan would have improved us (making the big assumption he would have considered coming). Hopefully Webster and Fisher will show you that they are not too bad tonight.