Waynetta

I know all your anger and bitterness has been building up in you for some time but being bitter only affects the person being bitter.

People who look close enough get the picture about how your posts and quotes are constructed to engineer statements out of their original context so I've no need or responsibility to breakdown more of your bile.

Anyone who waits a considerable length of time to plan some kind of tirade as you clearly have done with the 4 nations coming around can only amount to being a lowlife - you need to let it go and get a life away from these boards.

What on earth are you talking about? You are the one who posted 150 times in 48 hours about Briscoe's relative inadequacies vs Peter Fox. I do believe this has been referenced in the intervening period. Sadly for you, Offiah himself is very pleased with our Tom. Oops.

rlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/nov/11/england-four-nations-new-zealand?newsfeed

"I really can't remember a time when we had a better back three," said the former Widnes, Wigan and London Broncos flyer. "Hall and Briscoe are a really good pair of wings. They've both got a bit of toe, and they're also big lads."

Anyone who boasts as arrogantly and unnecessarily as you seem to enjoy doing needs to be able to take as well as give. As for the comment in red, says everything about your ability to handle the reminder of some of your more OTT comments. Or lack thereof. I do believe it's against the AUP. Cockle.

As a moderator you should be aware that name calling is against the AUP ?

You predicted big things from the Willie Mason signing too. Went well, that.

Milton Keynes.


I've always enjoyed the Dream Team. This year, Kirk Yeaman and Tom Briscoe we selected at centre and wing respectively. By the RL press. More than just McNamara that rates them, then.

You don't make constant references to anything, you're not on here enough these days. Bet you've mentioned your radio commentaries more than Marfa's mentioned her brothers though over the years.

Only irrelevant if you choose to ignore them.
Actually if you read back I offered no reasoning on either attack or defense in the early part of the thread in respect of my personal view.
What I did was prove Welham has a better attacking record then Yeaman after you said they were on a par
No nerves hit here at all, again read back and as is normally the case with you when your losing a debate you start to get all y.
If you think being called Waynetta is offensive then I shake my head in disbelief having seen how you respond to people on this site at times.

May I just say, Anakin Skywalker is a top notch moderator. When he edits out inflammatory name-calling, he puts it in red as a warning so we can see who's breached the AUP. Consistent. I like that.

It is irrelevant whether I find your comments offensive or not, you are clearly aware that it is against the AUP to call people names as you have banned several people for name calling on this board, now what I find difficult to grasp here is why you are doing it ?...I can only assume you are abusing your position of a moderator.If you persist in calling me names I shall take my grievance to Administration.

I am not losing a debate here, you lost the debate a few pages ago. Your original statement was that Yeaman is not the best left centre in this city! you then dragged up stats from the last 3 years to try and prove the point that Welham is better offensively than Yeamon, I clearly pointed out this years squad were picked on last seasons performances and Welham had only scored 1 more try than Yeaman, hence offensively last season they were on par.

Sorry, this is boring.

Is there a way to stop a thread from bringing up a golden page thing? My OCD mean's I can't ignore them but this is seriously dull, I may find myself watching "I'm a Z-list Celebrity".

Is this Kirk's Caribbean brother? Yea Mon!

Obviously it annoys you so hopefully you will be more considerate in your own posts in the future
A lesson learned perhaps.

McNamaras decision may have also been decided by Yeamans greater experiance as having made the decision to pick Reed 2 rookie centres at international level would of been a risk.
I'm more then capable of having a debate but its a pointless exercise with somebody who won't accept another point of view.

Yeaman would be great on I'm a Celebrity. He suits a jungle hat, he would be good at chopping wood for the fire, and would provide numerous "blonde" moments.