Why?

At this whole thread. 10 pages inside 24 hours regarding a mascot!!!!
I couldn't give a stuff who banned who, if the RFL or the UN get involved, not whether butt cheeks were revealed or not.

Jeez, roll on the weekend when we can start having a pop about each others team performances!

We should do what the governments do to spies, reciprical tit for tat bans.

1) You already banned the Airlie Bird in 2007.
2) If it's tit for tat against this banning, which SMC employee are you going to ban from Craven Park?

What an absolute barrel of shatpank this whole scenario is.

I didn't realise that the SMC even [ihad[/i a mascot, let alone that he visited NCP.

That was 2007 it is now 2010 i know you being a woman it is impossible to let something go ,but i was kind of hoping that us doing RH's testimonial both boards would stop acting like women

Deep undercover, blown now.

Because that would mean the "Its Rules fault", "FC are a bunch of morons" kneejerkeary outrage would all be for nowt and the originators that put the boot in without thinking would end up looking like idiots.

Which part of it being the SMC that issued the ban are you struggling with?

Not struggling with that at all more struggling with the fact that sad muppet from both side try to justify anything with "Yeh but you started it first". This forum is like a mini garza strip were both sides are as bad as each other