By the sound of it Kelly's gone definitely not playing next week made mistakes with signings contracts to big the last two coaching appointments were wrong for the club plus some more stuff

Basically said kelly has let down club and fans he won't play next week and hudge doesn't know if kelly will play again for club

On recruitment he felt we've paid too much for some players in the past and that will change. He also said not knowing what league we are in has hampered recruitment and they won't be 12 changes like the other season.

I need to do the maths?

Please read the league table and digest. We already have a better PD than Hudds who were shocking yesterday and who will lose to unbeaten Leeds. We play winless Featherstone next so our PD will be 50 points better then Huddersfield going into the last game. So In the last game we can lose as long as not by 50 clear points. Clear enough?

Problem is, that isn't math, that's just your opinion. Even as a Leeds fan I'm not sure we will win at Hudds now that we've done enough to guarantee safety.

What if Salford run in enough points against London & Batley to overtake our points difference?

4th will be alright...won't it?

And what happens if hudds beat us but Salford win there last 2 games against championship sides by big margins like today then weres your cast iron theory

No, absolutely crazy on your part to paint a scenario in this way.

As an ardent Rovers fan and a glass half full person, I would love your season ending synopsis above to come to fruition and perhaps it might.

However, your assertive attempts to depict a foregone conclusion scenario with 2 games to go and with multiple permutations still to play out, are deeply disrespectful to the other teams involved and an insult to our collective intelligence and recent experiences supporting this Hull KR team imo. Perhaps it's me being needlessly and cautiously realstic and over reactive towards you.

Hope you don't operate as a life coach with that level of smug arrogance and complacency on view.

In this possible, but by no means certain scenario, Hudds would only need to beat us by 25 or 26. Every point they won by would effectively count double - improving their PD and reducing ours.

I'd actually be a bit nervous about the psychology of 'defending a lead' from minute 1, especially if it was 'only' 12 or 14 points.

First things, first - Featherstone.

The other thing nagging at the back of my mind is that Salford might know they're in the MPG ahead of round 7, and can ease through their last game while we and Hudds exhaust each other.

You are right the all thing nags me but one thing for sure if we do get to stay in super league we want to make sure it does not happen again please

Leeds beating Hudds is no way a given, as a few have said they are safe and may be on the beach / operating table already. But even if Leeds win by say a standard 12 and we beat Featherstone by say 40 that will give us a 50 points cushion over Hudds, Hudds beat us by 25 and that gone as has been said starting a game out at +25 is a really odd position and attitude wise could be off putting.

Equally Salford will likely match any deficit we put on Feath, so they may have to beat Batley by 50 (less any score we lose to Hudds) not unlikely at all.

Shame that Leigh collapsed a bit on Saturday, had they gone into a game against us having to win by 40+ then they may have rested a few players and made it a hell of a lot easier for us.

I think that all ends up we'll have to beat Hudds to avoid the MPG, who it will be against is anyones guess

Let's forget about who needs to beat who and by how many! Just go out and win all three games and we should be alright.

You might want to re-do your maths.