Yeamans try was dodgy but I've seen them given. If we'd lost on that try I would have been annoyed but accepted it. The last illegal try was obviouscto the thousands watching tv and many their stadium. Forward passes can and do get missed. There is absolutely no accepting how Ganson gave this offside try.

Last years forward pass didn't actually win the game, Hodgsons awesome try did. Gansons inability to understand the rules and actually see anything DID give Hull the win.

The RFL cannot leave him in charge of the refs after this shocking inability to actually watch a game of RL let alone judge on it.

Ganson has always been a premadonna but enough is enough. #sackganson

And its late...

OK, buy I saw him get straight up and celebrate ... i didn't notice much after that as I was also celebrating...
initial reaction is always (in my opinion) a better judge on whether a player has scored a try or not... Too many times you see players confirming to others thay have scored when the VR rules it out and its clearly not a try..
I'll look forward to watching it again tomorrow ....

Gansons apology to Hull kr makes it all ok. Yes hes made a mistake but hes held his hand up which makes it ok. The RL are happy with the apology so its all ok too I feel much better about it now that I know its all ok

If the next Billy Slater hadn't been so far out of position that he couldn't get near the ball to catch it, there would have been no decision to make.

The decision was a bad one, but seems like Ganson has owned up to making a genuine mistake. It doesn't make it ok, but there's nothing your players can do but use it as motivation going forward.

People talk about these controversies harming the game, but 3 out of the four games today saw a team concede nearly 50 points, that's more damaging IMO.

Love Karma - apparently it always comes around!

That's very generous of you so fair play.

Personally I think Rovers would have won if the try had been disallowed since we would have had a penalty for offside from where the kick was made.

Could have gone for goal (2metres inside Hull half) or more likely with 6 tackles drive for the sticks and drop a goal.

We'll never know and of course all the talking can't change anything.

Everyone in the Sky commentary box, including Cummins, called it as a try. At no point could you be 100% sure he [ididn't[/i ground it and that's the test applied. I've seen far worse given under BOD.

Yeah - on viewing again Lynch isn't as close to Houghton as I remembered, and neither does Houghton run him onside. No idea who Ganson was tracking instead of Green TBH.

fair play, rovers were the better team and should have won the game. to be honest you should have been out of sight by the 70 minute mark. RL is a great sport which is too often let down by poor decision making by the officials, and today's was one of the worst i have seen. Yeamos was just about ok, but to be honest we didnt even deserve a draw but you don't always get what you deserve in sport

that said, as others have pointed out, if eden takes the ball we don't have this to discuss. i would get rid of him, too much of a liability despite his obvious attacking talent

impossible to say, you could for instance have knocked on on the first tackle and we could have scored under the new advantage rule, or you could have missed the penalty and we could have gone up the other end. too much uncertainty in sport

I wasn't fishing at all. the ball clearly touches the line while yeaman has downward pressure. VR's make calls on those on a regular basis and pretty much all of them are given. We know you're myopic when it come to rovers but doesn't mean you're right

The forward pass last year won you the game. If it had been chalked off you'd have lost