Ever considered a career in comedy Rolfie? No, thought not.

Not a shoulder charge? Watts didn't even get penalised for it, and it lead to your 1st try.
And what are you talking about, "we've had far worse out of the disciplinary than Rovers"-
Maybe your players haven't been as disciplined as ours, would be the simple answer.
Although 1 of your players recently had a charge downgraded so don't think you can complain

I think you've just stooped to a new low of stupidity with that first bit about Watts!! What have you been taking to think that wasn't a shoulder charge? Are you actually Stevo?

As can be seen from the photo above it clearly isn't a shoulder charge. Good, legitimate hit

Should have been a penalty, shoulder charge, but not late as was committed as seen from the picture

Larroyer was much worst and deserves a ban, so the RFL got it correct.

Watts' wasn't a shoulder charge! There was no rotation of the hips and an attempt was there to raise the arm. It was a great shot, that's why there's no charge.

Ha ha ha, of course it is,

And you're clearly just as blinkered as Jake. It was a clear penalty with initial contact being with the shoulder, his left hip also clearly comes forward into the tackle. FWIW Larroyer deserves a ban for his, not saying he doesn't, but Watts' was also a shoulder charge that at the least deserved a penalty, but agree no ban required.

You do realise you're allowed to hit shoulder first, don't you?

Yes thanks, in the attempt of making a legitimate tackle, of which he had no intention, his arm doesn't move to attempt this. Goes to show how different interpretations can be made, but he knew exactly what he was doing in shoulder charging a player that was making a kick.

Hmmmm, no rotation of the hips and an attempt to raise the arm = no shoulder charge.

Not quite sure why it keeps getting mentioned. The tackle rightly wasn't penalised and there's rightly been nothing said since.

Time to move on.

Here is the match review panel's view of the Watts tackle www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?6709

Here is the match review panel's view of the Watts tackle www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?6709

I think the RFL are wrong, by their own definition it wasn't a shoulder charge. Not surprised though, typical RFL.

You said earlier that it wasn't a shoulder charge and thats why the rfl didnt site him,yet the rfl said it was a shoulder charge and it should have been a penalty,but because it wasn't to the head no charge.So as usual your right and every body else is wrong.No change there then.Typical you

You really are a clown aren't you,you start off this morning saying the rfl are correct,and this afternoon they are incorrect.
Which one is it ?