Quote Vicenzo="Vicenzo"I would think that being told of a large tax bill would cover AP's comments about a "significant" amount of money wouldn't you. Just for the record, how would you value it. I will stand by my original statement that about a penny would cover it having done due diligence, wouldn't you? As to good will, name a RL club that has ever made a substantial profit. Let's be honest, I love the game but I know where it stands in terms of financial strength. I am not saying about the purchase price to be vindictive, only realistic!'"
No club has much "real" value, in terms of tangible fixed assets, with the possible exception of Leeds. You might be right that AP paid £0 and just agreed to cover the tax bill, but I think it's a bit unlikely. What's clear is that FC has as good a potential as most clubs to make a profit for the following reasons:
- We've touched averages 13.5k gates in recent years, despite being bab on the pitch
- We have a more decent merchandise set-up that turns over £1m+, again, despite being bab on the pitch
- In that context, we probably have a turnover of ~£5m
- Outgoings are relatively fixed; £0.6m to the SMC for all the ground & matchday services; up to £1.65m on player wages
- That leaves quite a bit of cash to either spend on overheads or keep as profit.
- FC's fans respond well to success on the pitch. In 2005 we made a quarter of a million profit.
I think it's this that has led Pearson to invest. In relative terms, rugby is cheap compared to football in terms of player cost, and he could potentially get, say, 15k in at the KC on a regular basis for more investment in players and coaching than the previous board were able or prepare to make, but in relative to football quite a small amount. Whether we actually spent the cap under Hetherington now seems unclear, but if we did, it seems evident that we got poor value for money, exacerbated by a coach out of his depth. AP will have looked at future cashflows based on increased crowds (incentivised initially by pass and maybe gate, price reduction), associated increased merchandise sales driven by improved performances on the pitch through increased spend on coaching, players and youth development. It's a punt, based on potential and projections, but to me he seems to be doing quite a lot to actually make it happen.
Poor Easty. No one else seems to be answering him.
