Basically then, he's been found guilty of trying to intentionally injure an opponent, and whilst this isn't good for us, it's the correct decision and we and him quite correctly have to take the punishment.

Play Hall on the left and switch Welham to the right or is that too much messing about?

Webster banned for two matches and fined £300 after being found guilty of making dangerous contact

Julien Rinaldi fined £500 but not banned after being found guilty of dangerous contact.


What a joke

Did [iyou[/i see the incident, Ginger?

No because there wasnt one thats why its bloody unfair, go on tell me u did

Did you phone a friend for that answer ginge

Nope, I was in Tesco at the time. Just wondered why you thought it was harsh - what (didn't) happen?

Ha Ha nope my husband went actually i mean webbo is a tackling machine, but hey ho we got hall

No one appears to know why he got the ban and like i have said my husband went and quite honestly there was nothing to suggest there was a problem with a tackle,i mean murrell and fitzy were scrapping but thats obviously allowed now.

Think it may have been something to do with [url=http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?2345this[/url.

Just think it's strange that after a tribunal has watched the evidence (even though you haven't and weren't there in the first place) you seem to think there was no incident at all.

Still, like you say, it's probably bloody unfair. Perhaps we'll all get to see it on BootsnAll tomorrow.

We all know tribunals arnt fair as you can guarantee if he appeals he will probably have the charges dropped isnt that the normal way of doing things with the RFL, because of course there will be different people looking at the evidence, and whether im there or not my husband is capable of seeing things, if a player does something wrong then fair does.