0/10.
Must try harder.

Initial reaction was it looked quite late and totally unnecessary. He may do well to only escape with fine/warning etc.

Anyone know what his disciplinary record was like in Aus?

So they are not launching it then?
Strange that as that was what you stated on your board.
Do everyone a favor and take your agenda elsewhere whilst you still have the posting rights to do so.

Case to answer, you reckon? (I'm trying not to start the season paranoid about the inequities of the disciplinary panel - we'll see how long that lasts.). One of those that found a bit of form today according to RH commentary - mind you, they did describe Widnes as 'abject' too.

With Gleeson still weeks away, apparently, how did Heil get on relative to how Salter has been playing?

Says on twitter gleeson out for the season not sure how true it is really

Do a Ganson Anakin, team warning, swiftly followwed by a spell on the side lines. Don't be a Silverwood!

Ouch.

A tweeter/twitterer with credibility? I assume there are some.

Jinxed him with all those comments about Jake Webster, haven't we?

I thought, at the time of watching, that he'd had a good game, actually seemed better tham Salter, but in the bar talking to friends sat in the West Stand they pointed out a few mistakes he'd made, and thought he'd had a poor game.
But he didn't do bad for a relative newcomer.

you dont get banned for winning money

Don't know if he took a knock but he half looked like he was struggling to keep up with the pace in the 2nd half.

Thought he was ok, but id say Salter is the better centre.

I'd be surprised it Paterson cops a ban, it wasn't a bad challenge just marginally late, I'd guess the video will probably show he was already committed to the tackle.

Genuine question here, I don't know the answer perhaps you do.

A few years ago Rovers aquired a 99 year lease on Craven Park giving them exclusive use of the stadium. If the stadium is required by anyone else they must pay Rovers not the council. Caterers pay Rovers, bar takings are Rovers etc etc. Rovers have the full & final say on all matters for 99 years.

For example if anyone wanted to put up pictures of Johnny Whiteley, they would need the permission of Rovers the leaseholders not the council the owners.

I once bought a flat leasehold and after the building society transferred funds there was no rent to pay at all. I was left with a mortgage but that went to the BS.

So my question is...do Rovers actually pay rent at all? Do leaseholders pay rent? Either way it's surely better than being unwelcome squatters at the KC.

Subject is Widnes at CP or it goes.