According to the fc forum,a member of the RFL is going to speak. I wonder if its sir stan or jake the peg ?

youtu.be/qzBsO2OiXvY

youtu.be/qzBsO2OiXvY

Watching tonight it has to be admitted that Adam Pearson is far more adept at these occasions than Neil Hudgell.

Perhaps Neil's microphone was faulty I'll give him the benefit but it was the devil's job to make out what he was saying whereas Pearson was loud & clear. Neil's habit of drifting his head either side of the mike whilst speaking might not have helped.

When it came to the debate on the new structure we had the inevitable moans and groans from the audience but Mr. Pearson seemed to be the quicker of the two to realise that the evening was fast becoming an argument to NOT buy a season pass for Hull, Rovers or any club in this crazy new system.

It was almost for a while a debate about why RL is complete rubbish and with every criticism Neil Hudgell seemed to be saying yes that's a very good point.

Pearson turned things back on message in a convincing fashion, talking about 2015 being the most important season ever to support Hull and how he had been won round after initial reservations about the new structure. He sounded like he meant it.

Neil Hudgell agreed sounding like he didn't mean it.

Probably neither of them meant it but hey fellas do you want us to keep turning up or not?

Pearson near the end talked of winning the next couple of games and how that would set up a great derby. The Upper West would definitely be open and he encouraged Rovers fans to attend. 'Well'...said Neil in his best world weary seen it all before mode...'it might all be meaningless by then'.

Yes it might be Neil. Maybe it'd be better if we all stayed at home.

Neil Hudgell does a great job as chairman and businessman...I do think it would be better if Neil Rudd or even Mike Smith represented us on these occasions. Unlike Adam Pearson he just cannot or will not put up the front which is actually necessary.

Now,now no need for name calling,if you pop back to the new player thread,page 14,it seems your only support was jake the peg,which speaks volumes about you.
As roversmad says,you and jake seem to be striking a bit of a romance,two little boys could be your theme tune.

Rovermad, the voice of sanity & reason. You two make a splendid couple, a bit like Cletus & Brandine from the Simpsons.

Do you ever post anything of any worth? Since your arrival (and I'll add Roversmad into the debate) this forum has plunged into an embarrassing trail of childish insults. I'm starting to wonder if you and frepneyboy from the fc forum are actually the same person as neither of you can seem to go more than 3 words without mentioning rolf harris in your case or Greg Eden in freptards case. Do me a favour and either grow up or go away, your an embarassment to all rational thinking rugby fans of any club...... rant over, and by the way I wont reply to any inane retort you wish to make as I've said my piece

A new poster dtrentHkr posted on the new player thread page 13/14 and stan thought it was fun to take the mick,I posted as regards josh manatello and it was my turn to be his target.It shows what you know,wildmoose/roversmad/dtrentHKR weren't happy about it as well.We posted as regards the thread,stan took the mick,so if your going to comment get it right,all I did was defend the new poster,if you approve of stan doing that your as bad as him.Regarding childish insults open your eyes and look where the childish insults come from and you will find stan the instigator as well,so get your blinkers off.No wonder new posters come and go quickly if they get the mick took by stan,ask them what they think about it,seeing as they all had a go back,still you'll be right.

Click on your profile and do a search of your posts, just looked at first 2 pages which is 20 posts, you have made a positive contribution in 3 of those posts the rest are ether insults or petty quips and that's across both our and the FC forum.

Not on the rovers thread,look through,nothing personal on the rovers thread,have a look at stans last 20 posts.

Two points.

Firstly, we're now arguing about arguments. Really?

Secondly, I'm am the champ of childish insults around here, if anyone wants to take that crown they'd better come hard and strong.

I bow to your superiority.

The 2 pages you looked at were responding to stan and jake,look past them.

Neil Hudgell can seem a bit downbeat [iat times[/i. In many ways I don't/can't blame him.

While it shouldn't matter, it kinda does, as you say. I tried very hard to not be too down on Sandercock for his tendency to miserabilism (in the press), and try to judge him on results, but did feel the slightly resigned and world-weary niche was already filled.