Mick Weyman up before the disciplinary for foul and abusive language to the ref ( I use the term loosely) this coming in a week when the televised game on Friday had several clear incidents of Leeds players abusing Childs. Bearing in mind Hudges ongoing issues with these clowns it will be interesting to see the outcome.

Just seeing the replay, was there also contact with the ref?

Clearly not, but that won't stop the RFL throwing the book at him.

Do we ever have a sending of sufficent verdict anymore

Leeds Rhinos forward Carl Ablett has been charged by the Rugby Football League for allegedly kicking Warrington winger Joel Monaghan during the game at The Halliwell Jones Stadium on May 30.

An allegation that Zak Hardaker of Leeds Rhinos made homophobic comments during the same game has also been referred to the RFL Compliance Department, which has begun a formal investigation.

Hull KR player Michael Weyman has also been charged with using foul and abusive language towards a match official during the 54-12 defeat at Castleford on June 1.

The RFL have charged Wakefield's Richard Moore with a Grade B striking offence in the match against Bradford on June 1, and during the same match Bradford player Elliot Kear, who submitted an early guilty plea, has been charged with a Grade A striking offence.
scott moore did
The RFL Match Review Panel deemed the sending off of London Broncos player Scott Moore to be sufficient following his high tackle on Hull FC player Callum Lancaster .

Ablett and Moore have until 11.00am on Tuesday to submitt Early Guilty Pleas but Weyman does not have the option of submitting an EGP and will appear before an independent disciplinary tribunal on Tuesday evening.

The RFL Match Review Panel also issued cautions to Matt Diskin (Bradford Bulls) and Eloi Pelissier (Catalan Dragons).

It appears we do. Scott Moore (who tried to take off young Lancaster's head on Saturday) is the lucky recipient of such a verdict this week.

You just couldn't make up some of the rubbish that comes out of Red Hall.

Mick will cop a 2 match ban and we will expect the usual let off due to a ' lack of evidence' as far as Hardaker is concerned, even though every bugger saw it on live tv

Even better is the fact Peacock appeared to call Childs a C word, and is not even up, makes you wonder what Weyman said to Roby, whatever it was if the panel want a second opinion I'd be happy to supply it, this nob really does seem to be our new refereeing nemesis.

A guy on the hull board just wrote this

Neil Hudgell has tweeted this little gem tonight. "I must have fallen asleep in class. Can't recall when match review panel had power to deem a sending off as sufficient?"

They'd miss

sandy has brainwashed you all into believing rubbish like this. Overall you get no better or worse out of the refs than all of the other also rans in the comp

If you say so Rolf.

couldnt agree more we are also rans, and we are all treat the same but the top teams are not peacock clearly called the ref a bent C--T picked up on camera nothing happens, what could Weyman have saidworse than that ? Hardaker subjects him to homophodic insults, so the charge says, now that they cant ignore as it breaks the law of the land not just the RFL.
Clearly not a level playing field, i dont think any ref has it in for us we are just not very good.

I've said it before as a fan your overlook the decisions that go for you and concentrate on the ones that go against you which in the end gives you a lopsided view of the game and makes you think your badly done to

Did you go to Cas?
Even Cas fans are saying we got nothing from Roby.
Not that it would have made much difference because as bad as he was, we were gash.