No are you for real? We are rock bottom. Wake up

Yet another reactionist. I was doubting Tim a little after the Wakey game. However yesterday we played well but were simply beaten by the better side.

Put it another way. If the crossbar try hadn't fallen so nicely for Hull and Shaw hadn't spurned a chance in the first half it would have been a draw.

Sheens is playing the long game. The youngsters look good but need time. Injuries are decimating us. Without Sheens experience would we have signed the shining star that is Atkin or managed to sign Carney?

Patience (and a bit of luck).

Whoa - That is incredible.



We were quite bad but thank goodness we played you lot. Any other side inc Toronto and Toulose would have beaten us. To think you played well is incredible. I genuinely laughed out loud.

Tim Sheens had the right tactic to pass the ball wide on tackle 2-4. You made a lot of metres like that.We are that bad we don't even learn from that.

Your win at Giants was amazing earlier in the season but you're a long way off that performance again.

We have some good players but we have a crap pack to put it mildly and we made a big mistake signing has been sit has not worked we should have bit the bullet and signed young ones not plays past their best the young ones we have if we stay up will come good with Tim’s coaching

I don't think you played badly you played to your strengths and we played the way we only could by going out wide but in the end you just bulldozed us down the middle

Dont be daft. That performance we put in yesterday wouldnt have beaten the top sides but would have seen off the current bottom 5 and certainly wouldnt have been troubled by Toulouse. I wouldnt quite stretch it as far as to say Rovers played well, but your post does both teams a big disservice.

We played a basic game. But basic doesnt equal poor. Taylor, Paea, Manu, Minichiello, Westerman are all international forwards and all played well. We completed over 90% for the first half. Rovers have some decent backs and good attacking shape and had a bit of success against a makeshift backline with an 18 year old on debut on one side and the conditiining coach on the other? Who ever saw that coming?

Just a couple of points name a coach that would come to us and do any better with the players available and remember what happened last time we sacked the coach mid season at the end of the day this year was all about surviving and when we have a full team out (hopefully) on the field come the middle 8s the championship teams don't worry me and as I've said before we have tried to sign some decent players but we're not an attractive option at the moment

Here we go again.Same nutter who texts sport talk pretending to be a kr fan

bit harsh about sheens imo, both teams where well down in numbers yesterday, if rovers can get there full team on the pitch you stay up, but where both dropping like flies atm,

I think it says it all that imo 2 of our better players in the forwards were lee and tickle,kavanagh hopeless,clarkson tries hard but only average,donaldson 100%but not big enough,scruton past his best,greenwood looked promising but has gone backwards other than the leeds game where he played centre and they would be in the team regardless of injuries.Why he wont push quinlan into the halves and put moss at full back I dont know,we need some pace in the halves.I know we have been desperately unlucky with injuries,but we have some highly promising backs who should be used in emergencys rather than putting forwards in the halves.As for sheens out,i dont think so,who else could do better ?

Not sure who you’d replace him with but it’s a results based business and at the moment, results are not on Tim’s side. Sometimes just the change in leadership can spark a change in the players. It’s known as the Hawthorne Effect.