Chris Chester has proved himself an astute, top class coach whose side plays superbly entertaing Rugby, racking up points all over the shop and all on a budget probably less than he had at Rovers...going to be in the running behind Daryl Powell for the coach of the year title.

Got us to Wembey with, looking back, a very average side. So what was the main reason we let him go so soon, and was it a mistake to favour Peacock over him...Should we have backed his judgement a little more? Certinly proved beyond doubt his superiority to Webster.

Should we fail to get up i doubt the board will sack Sheens so is there an inherent or unconscious bias somewhere at Rovers..??

He struggledthrowing off his assistant coach role at Rovers.
He's a much better assistant coach at Wakefield now.

Hahaha, what a crock of s##t. Pretty much like most of your posts.

I am really pleased for Chezzie. Smashing guy who had a pre-season planning aberration that severely impacted on his career at Rovers.

Would I have him back? Would prefer him to Webster for sure.

He had to go he had lost it the day he said Wakefield wasn't a must win game. He wasn't the super coach when we went and stuffed them by 50 odd points wasn't it?
No we should have brought Kier in but I'm not bothered now he's gone and in my opinion we now have a proper coach not some made up player that hadn't a clue on coaching we have had too many of them over the 50 odd years that I have followed rovers

Only most of them? Another fan