Quote: BiltonRobin "The HDM reports today that Horne is not taking part in full training due to his ongoing back problems.
He will be reassessed in the new year. This is 1 month before the start of the season. so will not be match fit for some time.
Does this makes the Larroyer decision a little more strange?'"
I think there is consensus on here that letting Larroyer go was the right decision, BR, due to his consistently sub par on field performances during the last 2 seasons. Perhaps the manner in which it was done by the club was questionable, especially from a communication standpoint.
That brings me nicely on to Graeme Horne. Would that be the same ongoing back problems that flared up when he missed those 2 vital tackles at the end of the MPG? If you listen to Jamie Peacock being interviewed today on Hull KR.TV, he twice refers to the fact that we were 2 missed tackles away from staying in Super League - a statement I agree 100% with.
I apologise in advance to Graeme Horne and any of his admirers for this seemingly matter of fact statement, but perversely it would do the club an immense favour if Horne was to succumb to this recurring back injury and retire from the game.
To me, his performances and contributions over the last 2 seasons have been just marginally better than Larroyer's, therefore undeserving of another 12 month contract imo. Perhaps Horne has already received the JP tap on the shoulder, my office in 10 minutes signal. In which case, the HDM article extract is marketing spin for the inevitable.