Haven't you got enough fannies in your team already - oh sorry that said Franny

So all younger than 24 before stepping up to SL? Plus all likely to have played at a better standard before moving up?

Plus I probably would prefer a no name Aussie, who will likely have had a better training and education into the game.

So you'd rather sign a player that has been proven to be not good enough based solely on his place of birth than one who has never been given a chance, just because you don't like where he's from or the league he's been playing in. Great mentality.

Why are some people getting their nickers in a twist over some player who no body knows when we do not know if the club has even signed him yet

This kid seems to have had plenty of clubs, is that not a sign of not been able to play at the highest level come 24? I don't care where our players are born, if they ain't good enough I do care! I'm failing to see any positives what so ever if this kid is going to be first choice, that's unless you can point some out to me?

It just seems strange to immediately write off a player that you've never seen play and know literally nothing about.

Surely at the age of 24 there is a reason why we have never heard of him?

Had you heard of blake green when he signed for us ?

Hey, that was really good. Have you considered a career in stand up comedy?

Blake green was playing 2nd grade in Australia this guy is playing for a poor French team anybody that is trying to sugar coat this signing are totally blinkered we have lost our best player and with £100.000 transfer fee for him the club go out and get this cheap gamble

How would you have heard of him unless you follow domestic French RL?