It looks like a certain someone has been taken in by all the spin.

I used to change your last coaches name in an attempt to make him a figure of ridicule. Strangely I don't feel the need with your new one!

I remember when Uncle Kath and Rule fed you all the same spin and you fools ate it all up, now your doing it again!

Do you ever get bored of posting inane, ambiguous drivel?

<s> do you?

I can see where your coming from but from his point of view, If you keep biting, he's gonna keep fishing.

That's a direct quote, it's the stuff around those were tone of the article is set. The J. Walker articles are a good example. As I pointed out on another thread, when he looked set to sign for FC he was 'highly-rated', had 'established a reputation as one the most promising young British forwards in SL' and had 'attracted the attention of a string of SL clubs'. He signs for us and it turns out his career had 'stalled'.

The tone of the Hull FC coverage in the Mail has been flowery and ott positive for a while. From those stories about the burning ambition of a relaxed and confident AP, through Jacob Miller's moment of ecstasy and soap opera good looks, to today's story about Andy Last with 'ideas swirling', a 'call to arms' and liberal use of the word 'pride' coming from the author's pen rather than the subject's mouth, as direct quotes. 'Nauseating', I've seen it called on the Hull board.

Mike Smith's coverage yesterday was more, he thinks this, he says this, with no reinforcement from the journalist. Which is fine, I prefer understated. It's just when the two styles bump up against each other, like with these international call-ups or the J. Walker signing that we maybe arch an eyebrow.

What the Helen of Troy did you hope to achieve with this thread?

Indeed.

I see the school is out again is it half term already why does anybody care what the HDM says it is mostly tripe when its about hull and rovers but its good for a