Quote: Easty "With two years left on his contract it would have to be a good offer for Rovers to want to cut short the deal of a very important player for us.'"
Burns coming available has likely made it a bit more palatable, especially if it means that we effectively free up more money to strengthen elsewhere. And good though he's been, [ianother[/i injury blighted season and we'd want shot most likely and struggle to do it.
While I'm not a fan of the competitive imbalance of SL, it is real and it'd be a bit harsh to stand in Blake's way for what is a great opportunity for him.
If we get £60-80k we'll have done very well - I can't see that covering Burns' deal for 2 years. As Penrith are paying him off, it might do for 1 season. All guesswork, like.