Quote: Mild Rover "It is now impossible to troll over there - they're more negative than I've ever been even when doing my 'alternative voice' bit. Think they'll beat Quins tbh, but if not I can see Agar getting the bullet - it'd be getting to the point of it being a mercy.
On the other hand it is quiet here. Nice change or a bit eery - what do we think?
Hudds. My team...
Briscoe, Fox, Webster, Welham, Hall; Murrell, Green; Clinton, Cockayne, Watts, Mason, Galea, Netherton.
Interchange
I never really post over there, too lazy, I have a read now and again, mainly for chuckles. "TrevLovesJanice" is my favourite.
It's eerie around here at present, fo sho.
I'm with you on the Murrell front, Morgan has now stated that Bell won't play, so there's not really any other option, the half backs aren't the problem at the moment, it's a lack of go forward and sloppy defence that's costing us.
Cockayne at hooker is a terrible idea, he knocks on at the ptb enough as it is without giving him 75% more opportunities for him to do so. I do see the logic in playing him from the start but his energy when inserted into the game more than makes up for the idiotic things he does, which imo he would probably do anyway. He also cannot pass at all to his left, which would be a slight problem at nine. Other than that, yes, I entirely agree.
