Quote: barham red "Let me get this right, you're 1st choice hooker was out, yet you replace him with a former man of steel yet you claim to be missing a hooker. The SH role was a loss but with so many internationals and 2 MOS's on the pitch surely someone should have stepped up.'"
Like I said, I would have expected Pryce to do that in the absence of our hookers and scrum halves (Roby is an impact hooker only; he hasn't got much in the way of organisational skill and we have only ever played him as impact, which is where he is effective). However, Pryce did not step up this time, presumably because Potter had some other plan in mind or maybe because Pryce is weary of doing the job. Who knows. I don't.
Quote: barham red "What suprises me is when you handed Leeds their ar$ses in the CC everyone was raving that the answer to your problems was John Wilkin '"
That is exactly what we thought. Wilkin and Pryce together at that match were sheer genius. It was tried again just a few weeks ago against Wakey and was rubbish. I have absolutely no idea what changed, but change it did. Presumably that is why it didn't happen either last week or this.
I'm suspecting Potter gets quite a few things wrong but that just sounds like sour grapes.
Wouldn't mind your coach. Pity he wanted to stay with you!
(Don't blame him mind!)
