Yep i agree also! The way Ben played on sunday deserves to be in the team anyway. Gives Welham a week off

Its a criteria I use for judging mine, in our first season I had Jason Netherton as mine for all those reasons, its easy to pick a fast winger who gets 30 tries, I always look at WHY he has thirty tries, its usually because the unsung lads are doing the hard graft to make the chances for them.

We will not get anywhere with a team full of players like Fox, we need the Fitzies, Charlies and Nethertons as well.

Yeah I agree. But what if we had a team of Stanley Gene's?

Some fair points there.

I think you'd see even better from both if Fisher started and Fitzhenry came off the bench in a sort of Jame Roby kind of role.

How have you worked that out? Fisher's distribution is first class as we saw yesterday when he came on, the game changed. Fisher brings so much more to the role and what you lose when he's off outways what Fitzy brings at Hooker in my opinion. I like Fitz, but Fisher is twice the Hooker he is.

I personally think Makali changed the game with his impact and go-forward and Fisher fed off that rather that Fisher creating it by himself.

I don't disagree that Fisher is a more complete hooker but Fitzhenry is a more composed professional.

Alternating their respective roles might be worth a punt but let's wait until Vella is back fit and see how we go when he starts.