Touches it or not, try or not! makes no odds, Leeds would have still beaten your lot. Think yourselfs lucky the ref kept you in the game so long with the persistant biased penalty blowing in your favour.

There was no benefit of the doubt needed. It was clear to see on the replay the ball rotation change when his hand hit it. If there wasnt a video ref it would have been given as a try but thats what VRs are for isnt it, to disallow tries that should be disallowed?

Quote Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006="Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006"tell that to justin www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... 1188#views'" Morgan in rank hypocrisy shocker Hull KR coach Justin Morgan brushed off Steve Ganson's controversial late decision that led to his side's match-winning try in the derby game with Hull FC in Cardiff. "It is what the referee says. We have been on the end of good and bad calls all season," he said. "Everyone is on the end of bad calls. It's what's gone in the little box at the end of the day and it's us that got two points. That's all that matters.

Quote Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006="Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006"tell that to justin www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... 1188#views'" Morgan in rank hypocrisy shocker Hull KR coach Justin Morgan brushed off Steve Ganson's controversial late decision that led to his side's match-winning try in the derby game with Hull FC in Cardiff. "It is what the referee says. We have been on the end of good and bad calls all season," he said. "Everyone is on the end of bad calls. It's what's gone in the little box at the end of the day and it's us that got two points. That's all that matters.

Have to say, I thought it should have been BOD. While he probably did, you can't conclusively say that he touched the ball with his hand.

FFS it was last season - get over it.

Anyway, the ball hit berrigan's left forearm.

I am over it. I was pointing out Morgan's hypocrisy. He admitted it was a bad call by Ganson in Cardiff but said you get good and bad calls and have to live with it. This in a situation when Rovers won by 5 points.

Rovers get a bad decision against them and lose by 8, and a "bad call" (which was actually correct) is then entirely blamed for the defeat. Is that entirely consistent, in your opinion?

Not really. If the cameras weren't there then Donald and Senior would've probably been given tries before that anyway.

How the hell is it hypocracy, the call at MM last season was GOOD, the one on Friday was BAD.

Sounds like the truth to me.

On the one hand he's saying a bad call is immaterial in the context of a game, these things even themselves out and are irrelevant. When Rovers win by 5.

On the other he's saying one bad call, which was actually a good call, is the entire reason for a result. When Rovers lose by 8.

No it wasn't.

Get over it.

I didnt quite see it that way !!!!!