69 mins Raiders 18 Dons 64

No the Dons have gone off. Wales score again.

They are gonna get roasted!

76 mins Raiders 18 Dons 70

Try Muranka
Conversion Miller

FT Raiders 18 Dons 70

Finished 18-70
No stamina!
lol

I posted 'as if' to the bookies prediction.
They didn't factor in the idiot factor.
Being an idiot ... I did.

Positives;
Away win
2 competition points
A number of try scorers
Performances by Ross Osborne and Connor Scott.

Negatives;
Too many individual errors e.g. not taking the first half kick off and eventually knocking on allowing Raiders to have the ball in our 20 for the first couples of sets. Half hearted attempt to gather a lost ball resulting in a try to the opposition in the second half.
After the first 10 minutes of the second half we lacked any consistent structure or creativity, this will be a problem in future matches if not addressed.
Defensively not solid enough in the second period, again this will be a problem going forward.

Excellent stuff - thanks for the performance appraisal.

Did read a players interview that said game fell apart early in the second half due to changes made from the sub bench and only having one player left on the bench? I wasn’t there so not sure what went on but injury wise that sounds worrying.

Its ok in time of injury crisis we can rely on our DR relationship with Hull to supply us with players and in no way sign one of our better players at a detriment to The Dons....oh hang on wait a minute.

Oldham are in Llanelli this weekend. It will be interesting to compare their result with ours.

Bet365 are giving the Raiders 60 start.

Oldham won 74-0.

The Raiders fail to score for the third time in 4 matches.

Defensively, the Dons need a significant improvement to be considered promotion candidates.

The Raiders failed to score today for the 4th fixture in 5.

As I have stated before, the Dons have much to do defensively to remain competitive.

Hard to argue with that. Bradford by a mile to win the league the result at Haven gives everyone a little breathing space.