From what I hear, Oakwell is a better shout..

My thought was that New York Stadium in Rotherham would have been ideal.

Seen as they are currently trying to half inch 25K off of us I sincerely hope they don't ground share and will be extremely disappointed with the decision makers of they do.

Considering the problems we have with home matches during the Rovers' close season, I can't see where the Seagulls will fit in.

The old chestnut about the teams merging will no doubt come up again in the circumstances but as far as I'm concerned must NEVER happen.

theres only drfc that can answer that and they will do whats in the interest of their pocket but if it was up to me i would never happen

Completely out of our hands, fans won't be considered, but as said, with the problems we have with fixture scheduling, can't see it happening. Think Donny has it right in saying oakwell.

Doncaster Rovers and Ourselves are the same entity now, so our interests should be their interests. Sporting loyalties aside, even from a business point of view by allowing an obvious competitor direct access into our customer base for however long (and lets not be under any illusions the Seagulls won't promote the hell out of it around Doncaster) just doesn't make sense unless their is enough compensation, lets say 10k a game split between the Dons and Team Doncaster Admin.

It's like Lidl being allowed to sell their wares from a Sainsbury's store for a year.




(Sheffield = Lidl in this analogy)

If I was a betting man, I'd be putting my money on the Keepmoat.

It's the firm favourite.

I've already paid for a 2015 season ticket. If I thought we were offering the Keepmoat to the Eagles, the money would still be in the bank!

I'd welcome the chance to watch an exciting side ..... lol

Only joking!

Joking? Seems fair comment to me.

Didn't aston say when we got promoted something along the lines of the teams that have come up demean the championship?

Funny how we've got a permenant home and finished 4th this season............

( Awaits appeal on above comment )